Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

I Dream of Hollywood - by Journeywoman

Who's Hotter? - The Brat Pack Vs. the "It" Girls

August 26th 2007 08:16
Anne Hathaway
Anne Hathaway of Becoming Jane and The Devil Wears Prada
Britney Spears, Keira Knightley, Lindsay Lohan, Anne Hathaway, Paris Hilton and Scarlett Johansson...
Between them these six girls have captured the eyes of the world more than any celebrities their age. Even so, you would almost never find them mentioned in the same breath, unless a sharp contrast is being made. Keira Knightley and Lindsay Lohan, for example, are both internationally recognised actresses - just for vastly different reasons!

Everyone has an opinion about these girls. People love them, or, love to hate them. Their profiles plaster the covers of the tabloids, fashion mags and in the event of a major media coup de gras even the newspapers will splash them accross the cover.
Paris Hilton
"I'll be good... I swear!"
But who is more famous? Who is hotter property? And why exactly is it that we care?
The "It" girls (Keira, Scarlett and Anne) are the "artists" in Hollywood in their twenties who have managed to capture the hearts of the masses with their dazzling work on screen. But what separates them from their "Brat Pack" counterparts is the absence of scandal.

You won't find pictures of KK, ScarJo or Annie getting out of SUV's without their panties on! You won't find them dating questionable rock artists, boozing, drugging or sleeping around. No! You find a picture of these girls, chances are it's from the pages of Harpars Bazaar, Vogue or InStyle - and it will be tastefully posed and gently airbrushed.
Lindsay Lohan
Lindsay Lohan of Jack Daniels and Coke
More over, these girls hardly ever stop working, so embracing the drug culture is out. They have no entourage (as has been the fashion in Hollywood since the 1920's!), they dress with quiet reservation at home and with daring flare on the red carpet. No costume malfunctions, make-up in place and hair styled to perfection.
Basically these lovely ladies work hard to maintain the image and reap the benefits as a result. It is hard work. It's also damned expensive. But hey, who wouldn't go to the extra effort to look like they do? And an Oscar is also a nice perk on the side!
Keira Knightley
Keira Knightley - the flush of England's roses
In Keira Hollywood has a young, coltish, Katharine Hepburn type. In ScarJo they have a new, robust Grace Kelly/Marilyn Monroe cross-over. In Anne Hathaway they have an fresh faced Ava Gardner. They're beautiful, radiant, glamorous, and CAREFUL!!! They're it!
The "Brat Pack" are their polar opposites.
Let's start with the train-wreck du jour, Britney Spears. Frankly there hasn't been a case of singer going so far off the rails since Judy Garland last hit the sauce and decided she needed a new husband! Very unflattering pictures! Hideous instances of what can only be called public emotional breakdowns, deliberately seeking out the papparazzi just to make sure you're still wanted! It's truly vile!
Scarlett Johansson
ScarJo - the next Rita Hayworth?
And then there's Lindsay! One day she is going to write a very frank book... and her parents are not going to look good! The last celebrity family to look THIS weird had to be The Munsters!!!
Of course Paris claims she has ("Praise Jesus!") made a great turn around and is on the way on a bright new path... ppffffffffttttt!! This one's a keeper. She addicted to her own headlines and her own image. One day she will no doubt end up living in a broken down mansion on Sunset Boulevard with Nicole Richie, dreaming of a comeback and ensnaring hot young guys in her scarred clutches...
But what's wrong with these girls? Basically they made it big too quickly and it just became impossible to keep their feet on the ground. When the entire world seems to revolve around you why bother stopping it? Even if it is spinning towards disaster, it still seems like a mighty cosy ride on the way there!
All of them you will note, once were considered legitimate artists - well, okay, not Paris, though she did try bless her with those lame movies and that hideous album! - and they have simply since fallen on hard times. Or rather they have fallen in with the wrong crowd and not had the brains or the will-power to draw themselves out of it!
Britney Spears
Britney Spears - the next Janis Joplin?
Lindsay Lohan was, admittedly born in bad company. BritBrit too has problems with Mommie, but there was a time when she looked to have conquered the world. It was only when she hit her twenties that she really was revealed as a psychopath! But then years of dancing for Disney and singing songs like "Oops... I did it Again" and "Hit Me Baby One More Time" can probably do that to you!
And Paris... too much money and not enough education (class!!!).
So there you have it, the most beautiful/oversexed, celebrated/infamous girls in the world in all their glory/gory. But still, aside from their youth and vitality, these girls are worth looking at for more than just the obvious reasons.
Though everyone understands that history repeats itself, we seldom bother to take note of it so that we can understand what's going to happen, how and maybe even try to stop it. But take note of these six girls, because by 2020 one of them will be dead - immortal in fact. Every generation of Hollywood's starlets has one.
Natalie Wood, Marilyn Monroe, Jean Harlowe, Lupe Velez - the girls who expired after spending their twenties being over-exposed to the spotlight. Anyone care to place a bet who's next? I mean this is Hollywood after all! There's a betting shop on the Boulevard of Broken Dreams!
72
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
1 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by James Rickard

August 26th 2007 16:50
Good post! I've often wondered about today's "stars" vs. the stars of yesteryear. Will we talk about any of those six the way we talk about Marilyn Monroe, Rita Hayworth, or Elizabeth Taylor? For that matter, in the current crop of "cute" man-boy actors, where is the next Carry Grant, John Wayne, or Gary Cooper?

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
5 Posts
225 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Journeywoman's Blogs

5002 Vote(s)
238 Comment(s)
65 Post(s)
2767 Vote(s)
42 Comment(s)
40 Post(s)
4699 Vote(s)
74 Comment(s)
64 Post(s)
Moderated by Journeywoman
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]