Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
All the latest happenings in the world of film and Hollywood fame, plus movie reviews and celebrity profiles.

Profiling Oscar - or - How to Win an Oscar in a Leading Role

August 15th 2007 06:38
Misery
Kathy Bates - Best Actress - 1990
In interesting to consider, given how much attention is given to just one award ceremony, no one ever really profiles it. Are there definitive trends? Are there lists of "do's" and "don't's" so far as Oscar is concerned? Is there a sure fire way to get yourself a prime Oscar candidacy? If you are a leading actor or actress, what can get you up onto that stage and into Hollywood history?

We have examined the two categories, Best Actor in a Leading Role and Best Actress in a Leading Role, going back over the last seventeen award ceremonies to 1990. It's an interesting experience - and something of a culture shock!
For instance, in 1991, Anthony Hopkins was fifty-four! He becomes a septuagenarian in December of this year! In 1999 an unbelievably young Hilary Swank took home an Oscar - and seemingly overnight became a woman who could be anything from 25 to 35! - No offence Hil!
The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs - 1991 - Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins won Oscars for this intelligent horror movie
More importantly, Oscar displays definable fads, and they change on a semi-regular basis. More importantly, there are a few sure fire conditions for Oscars glory. With this in mind, here are a few of the facts we found...

In the 90's, if you were a leading actor, it was best is you were aged somewhere on the older side of ages 35 to 60. Only one actor under 35 took home a Best Actor Oscar - Nicolas Cage for Leaving Las Vegas in 1995, and that was one of Oscars less popular choices to be sure.
By contrast, in the present decade the gap has narrowed to the age-group 35 to 45. Only two actors exist outside this narrow spectrum: Adrien Brody (2002, The Pianist, age: 29) and Denzel Washington (2001, Training Day, age: 47). The rest have fit neatly into the late-thirties, early 40's bracket, most probably because, this male demographic appeals more to women.
Forrest Gump
Tom Hanks won the second of his two Best Actor Oscars in this film
Actresses, are spookily different. In the 90's, Oscar winning actresses range from a young Hilary Swank at age 24, to a more mature Susan Sarandon at age 49. The average age of an Oscar winning actress in the 90's was, however, 35 years and six months.
A decade on... 35 years and six months!!!
The age spectrum was also somewhat less dazzling. The youngest Oscar winning Best Actress was Charlize Theron for 2003's Monster at age 28. The eldest actress was last year's winner Helen Mirren who, at 61, was more than twice the age of the rest of the decade's winners.
The basic answer seems to be, Oscar likes buff 40-ish men (no pun intended) and women at their sexual prime (mid 30's). But then again, if you look at the range of talent on display in Hollywood these days, the most talented actors are aged from around 35 to 45. But could the same be said of the actresses?
It would seem that the big hitting Oscar nominated more mature actresses such as Meryl Streeps, Dianne Keaton's, Judi Dench's and Annette Bening's are being overlooked in favour of one hit wonders such as Helen Hunt, Julia Roberts and Halle Berry.
Dead Man Walking
It was not common for biopics to win Oscars in the mid 90's but Susan Sarandon did just that with this movie in 1995
Why? Because it's far more marketable of course. The young studs may sell magazine's but it's the older boys who sell tickets. The old gals may set the screen ablaze, but it looks far more impressive on their resume to have "six time Oscar nominated" while the younger 30-ish Hollywood Mom's are what get audiences juices flowing.
What about genre?
Dead easy! You want an Oscar? You want a Drama. Be it criminal, romantic, costume heavy, political, war, action or even a psycho thriller, it has a better chance of winning an Oscar than any comedy. Only one comedy (and the term is used loosely!) has hit it big for its performers at the Oscars: 1997's As Good as it Gets - which snared Oscars for the legendary Jack Nicholson and the seriously over-rated Helen Hunt.
Otherwise, there is a better chance of winning an Oscar in a horror movie! All be it an intelligent, well written horror movie. No slasher flicks for Oscar!
Monster, Silence of the Lambs and Misery have all collected Oscars. However, ther Academy clearly prefers gals being scary to guys - only Anthony Hopkins has collected an Oscar from a horror movie.
As Good as it Gets
The only comedy to hit it big at the Oscars for it's two leads in the last twenty years
A great deal has been made of late of the success of the biopic in grabbing Oscars for Hollywood's leading ladies and gents. It's no myth what's more. Eleven movies have grabbed Oscars for Lead Actors and Actresses since 1990 - five for men, six for women.
However, it should be noted that the trend started with the actresses with Julia Roberts in Erin Brockovich in 2000, whereas the Best Actor category only became over-run by Biopics in 2004 with Jamie Foxx in Ray.
Over the last seven years, five Leading ladies have won Oscars for pretending to be someone else. Prior to 2000, however, there were only three biopics that made it for their leads at the Oscars: Shine, Dead Man Walking and Reversal of Fortune.
Also good to note: actresses are far more likely to hit home with a political or a romantic drama; actors in an war/action or a crime drama.
What about nudity? Simple answer: guys - absolutely not. Gals: only if they go all the way. Monster's Ball, Shakespeare in Love and The Piano all feature some pretty explicit nudity. Is it a surprise that the actresses who scored with those pictures were all somewhat contraversial decisions - certainly one off's! Where is Holly Hunter these days?
Boys Don't Cry
Hilary Swank came out of nowhere to win the first of two Oscars in 1999 with Boy's Don't Cry
And the first African-American Best Actress winner should have been Whoopi Goldberg in The Colour Purple! EVERYONE knows that!!!
What sort of character?
Here the spectrum is pretty broad. Everything from socialites to actresses, to police, to singers to nuns. But the general rule of thumb for leads seems to be as follows: it's better if your character is NOT a traditional hero type. Something more off-beat and colourful is far more likely to grab the gold. Villains are not likely winners.
Over the last seventeen years between all the Best Actor and Actress nominations only four winners have been villains: Hannibal Lecter (The Silence of the Lambs, 1991), Idi Amin (The Last King of Scotland, 2006), Annie Wilkes (Misery, 1990) and Aileen Wuornos (Monster, 2003). The pattern seems to be that Oscar likes to start each new decade with a fresh villain. So for the rest of the 2000's - it's not likely that any villainous characters are going to take home a Best Actor or Actress Oscar.
Note also, if you are going to play a villain, make them as vile as possible. Nothing short of a sadistic serial killer or a cannibal will do!
Monster's Ball
Halle Berry won a contraversial Best Actress Oscar in Monster's Ball in 2001
One important thing to remember when it comes to the Oscars is nationality. Though the Academy has been praised in recent years for the ethnic diversity of its nominees - and British actresses win all the time don't they?! - the rule of thumb remains the same. You have a hugely improved chance of winning an Oscar if you are an American.
Nine out of thirty-four winners in the last seventeen years have NOT been American. Nominees, who already have a one in five chance of winning, can quarter those chances again if they are not American - or a chance of about 5%.
Also, it's still better to be white! Only three African American actors and one African American actress have won Best Lead Oscars since 1990 (or ever in the case of Actresses!). Basically, African American actors have a 3% chance of victory. African American actresses only 1%. Now surely this can be acceptable to no one!
Racism aside, best to remember, if you do happen to be a leading actor or actress after an Oscar, it's better if the movie is ABOUT your character. It is certainly possible to be the billed lead of a film without it being structured around you. However, it is better if the story IS the character.
The Pianist
A 29 year old Adrien Brody became the youngest Best Actor Oscar winner of the decade with the Pianist in 2002
Half of all movies made in the last seventeen years which have gone on to win Best Actor or Actress Oscars have been about the character who won. Certainly this raises the bar in terms of the requirement of the performances Oscar will accept, but surely this is a good thing.
Final thing to remember: if you are unlucky enough to have a co-star... hope they lose! Or better still that they don't get nominated!!! Only two films have garnered both Best Actor and Best Actress Oscars since 1990. They were both in the 90's (Silence of the Lambs and As Good as it Gets). Moral of the story: BILLING!!! Make sure your co-star gets featured and not leading billing and have the writer on your side!
Final important note: if you HAVE already won a Best Actor and Actress Oscar - you're more likely to win a second within ten years of your first win. Only five performers since the Academy Awards were established in 1928 have won consecutive Oscars in leading roles that were more than ten years apart.
Capote
These days Oscar loves a good Biopic, but after seven years prominance their demise is iminant
They were Katharine Hepburn, Vivien Leigh, Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson. Appropriate when you consider that to win an Oscar you very much must stay on the cutting edge of the industry in terms of performance and the films chosen.Most performers can barely sustain their celebrity for longer than a decade.
Hepburn, Leigh, Brando and Nicholson remain four of Hollywood's most iconic names even now - and Nicholson is still going strong!
In practice, so far as the 80th annual Academy Awards ceremony is concerned, it means the following...
Kevin Spacey (1999, American Beauty) and Gwyneth Paltrow's (1998, Shakespeare in Love) Hollywood careers are officially over!
47
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Comments
1 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by JohnDoe

August 15th 2007 23:55
Fun read DavidN,
Though I think the Oscars lost all credibility in the 80's...

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
6 Posts
8 Posts
310 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Journeywoman's Blogs

8712 Vote(s)
117 Comment(s)
114 Post(s)
7406 Vote(s)
161 Comment(s)
91 Post(s)
Moderated by Journeywoman
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]